Nordlinger: Mac or Music Critic?

I know we totally just bagged on Nordlinger the other day–we might have questioned the integrity of his mental faculties, it’s true–but we’re gonna post about his review of the Fleming/Levine affair at Carnegie.

Obviously, we’ve been a little frustrated with the watery non-criticism provided by the classical reviewers at The Times, so at least Nordi isn’t afraid to launch a crit bomb every once in a while.

First, he was kind of right about the middle movement of the Berlioz. It was effectively somnolent, to say the least.

And second, he confirms the crappy playing of the horn section in at least one part of the program.

But why, oh why, can’t he just tighten up his prose a little? It’s impossible to get through paragraphs like this, regarding Fleming’s first set:

The three songs we heard are classic Dutilleux: concentrated, intricate, economical — not a note is wasted. And those notes are good and interesting.

And-this-re-view-is-writ-ten-by-a-com-pu-ter. Come on!

Advertisements

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s